Which is better? |
That topic is up for much debate, and I can only give my personal opinions on the subject, although
you might also check out C|Net's comparison
of the two drives.
I hate SyQuest drives and their technology. The EZ drive is basically a smaller version of their
larger SyQuest drives; They still use rigid disks in hard plastic casings, and have all of the
same frailties of the SyQuest format; If you drop a disk on a hard surface from more than a couple
of feet, it's likely all over for that disk.
Yes, the SyQuest drive is faster. Yes, you can put 35-ish more megs on it and the media is just about
the same price. But a little extra speed and 35 megs difference is personally not worth it to me, and
I refuse to give my money to a company who throws out a hacked-together product in the name of competition.
They didn't attempt improve anything over the SyQuest format with the EZ drive, including the awkward disk
eject method. The only thing they did with the EZ was make it small.
Personally SyQuest drives make me angry and I hope are on their way out of phase to better technology.
We have a 200MB SyQuest drive at work which reads/writes to 200MB disks fine, but reads/writes to
smaller SyQuest disks at less than floppy-disk speed. Yea, it's backward compatible as they tout so
heavily, but it's nearly useless. On a PowerMAC, it takes over 10 minutes to copy 20 megs of data to
a 44MB SyQuest. (Note: The EZ drive isn't backward compatible with anything; It
cannot read/write to other SyQuest media which are physically larger.)
So, there. Soap-box Mode Off.
|